See, Learn, Apply: Field-Based Education for Rice Planthopper Management

Authors

  • Fitria Dwita Marlianti Universitas Bengkulu
  • Firos Adel Wahyujarman Universitas Bengkulu
  • Irene Putri Keysa Rhamadani Universitas Bengkulu
  • Nabil Agustiawan Universitas Bengkulu
  • Yosivia Tiara Shieni Universitas Bengkulu
  • Melani Artika Sari Universitas Bengkulu
  • Analisa Amara Kurniadi Universitas Bengkulu
  • Ananta Pratama Ferindia Universitas Bengkulu
  • Alvinna Aprilia Universitas Bengkulu
  • Rafly Abid Ananda Universitas Bengkulu
  • Saprinurdin Universitas Bengkulu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24127/sss.v10i2.19

Keywords:

Agricultural Extension, Farmer Learning, Field Demonstration, Integrated Pest Management, Rice Planthopper Management

Abstract

Rice planthoppers remain an important constraint in rice production, while farmers’ understanding of appropriate management practices is essential for preventing severe crop damage and unnecessary pesticide use. This community service activity aimed to strengthen farmers’ self-reported understanding of rice planthopper management through an extension session and direct field demonstration. The activity was conducted in Gelombang Village, Bengkulu Province, Indonesia, in July 2026 and involved 30 rice farmers. A one-group pre-test–post-test design was applied using 20 identical Likert-scale statements. Complete paired responses from 28 participants were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, while three additional post-test evaluation items were summarized using frequencies and percentages. The mean score increased from 37.36 in the pre-test to 89.00 in the post-test, with an average improvement of 51.64 points. The difference was statistically significant (W = 2.00, p < .001), with a very large rank-biserial effect size of 0.990. Twenty-seven of the 28 participants obtained higher post-test scores. The questionnaire also demonstrated high internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha values of 0.900 for the pre-test and 0.909 for the post-test. In addition, most participants reported that they could follow the demonstrated procedures, felt confident applying rice planthopper management practices, and were willing to adopt appropriate and environmentally responsible management. These findings indicate that combining extension with direct field demonstration can produce a strong immediate improvement in farmers’ self-reported understanding. Follow-up evaluation is required to assess long-term knowledge retention and actual implementation in the field

References

Bajiya, M. R., & Kumar, R. (2024). Impact of integrated pest management farmer field school programs in the subtropics of Jammu and Kashmir, India. International Journal of Pest Management, 70(4), 1315–1330. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2022.2111617

Cai, J., Hu, R., & Hong, Y. (2022). Impact of farmer field schools on agricultural technology extension—Evidence from greenhouse vegetable farms in China. Applied Economics, 54(24), 2727–2736. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1996530

Chepchirchir, F., Muriithi, B. W., Langat, J., Mohamed, S. A., Ndlela, S., & Khamis, F. M. (2021). Knowledge, attitude, and practices on tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta, on tomato and potential demand for integrated pest management among smallholder farmers in Kenya and Uganda. Agriculture, 11(12), 1242. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11121242

Hassan, S., Venkateswaran, S. P., & Nadarajah, V. D. (2021). Evaluation of immediate impact of faculty development programme using a pretest–post-test study design format. Innovation and Education, 3, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42862-021-00009-9

Kvakkestad, V., Steiro, Å. L., & Vatn, A. (2021). Pesticide policies and farm behavior: The introduction of regulations for integrated pest management. Agriculture, 11(9), 828. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11090828

Liu, Y., Shi, R., Peng, Y., Wang, W., & Fu, X. (2022). Impacts of technology training provided by agricultural cooperatives on farmers’ adoption of biopesticides in China. Agriculture, 12(3), 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12030316

Mgendi, G., Mao, S., & Qiao, F. (2022). Does agricultural training and demonstration matter in technology adoption? The empirical evidence from small rice farmers in Tanzania. Technology in Society, 70, 102024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102024

Muduli, L., Pradhan, S. K., Mishra, A., Bastia, D. N., Samal, K. C., Agrawal, P. K., & Dash, M. (2021). Understanding brown planthopper resistance in rice: Genetics, biochemical and molecular breeding approaches. Rice Science, 28(6), 532–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2021.05.013

Nyangau, P., Muriithi, B. W., Diiro, G., Akutse, K. S., & Subramanian, S. (2022). Farmers’ knowledge and management practices of cereal, legume and vegetable insect pests, and willingness to pay for biopesticides. International Journal of Pest Management, 68(3), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2020.1817621

Rahman, M. S. (2022). Farmers’ perceptions of integrated pest management and determinants of adoption in vegetable production in Bangladesh. International Journal of Pest Management, 68(2), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2020.1807653

Shi, S., Wang, H., Zha, W., Wu, Y., Liu, K., Xu, D., He, G., Zhou, L., & You, A. (2023). Recent advances in the genetic and biochemical mechanisms of rice resistance to brown planthoppers (Nilaparvata lugens Stål). International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(23), 16959. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242316959

Song, X.-Y., Peng, Y.-X., Gao, Y., Zhang, Y.-C., Ye, W.-N., Lin, P.-X., Gao, C.-F., & Wu, S.-F. (2023). Resistance monitoring of Nilaparvata lugens to pymetrozine based on reproductive behavior. Insects, 14(5), 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14050428

South, L., Saffo, D., Vitek, O., Dunne, C., & Borkin, M. A. (2022). Effective use of Likert scales in visualization evaluations: A systematic review. Computer Graphics Forum, 41(3), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14521

Sun, X., Lyu, J., & Ge, C. (2022). Knowledge and farmers’ adoption of green production technologies: An empirical study on IPM adoption intention in major Indica-rice-producing areas in the Anhui Province of China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14292. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114292

Yang, Q., Zhu, Y., & Wang, F. (2021). Exploring mediating factors between agricultural training and farmers’ adoption of drip fertigation system: Evidence from banana farmers in China. Water, 13(10), 1364. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13101364

Zakariya, Y. F. (2022). Cronbach’s alpha in mathematics education research: Its appropriateness, overuse, and alternatives in estimating scale reliability. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1074430. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1074430

Zeng, Z.-X., Shi, J.-H., Qiu, C.-L., Fan, T., Lu, J., Abdelnabby, H., & Wang, M.-Q. (2024). Nitrogen input reduces the physical defense of rice plant against planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera: Delphacidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 117(6), 2440–2449. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toae240

Published

2026-07-31

Issue

Section

Articles